;
The
Federal Government has withdrawn the recent threat to activate the ‘no work no
pay policy’ against striking university teachers.
This
was disclosed by the National President of the Academic Staff Union of Universities, ASUU, Prof. Biodun Ogunyemi, in an exclusive chat with Vanguard
yesterday. Ogunyemi also said that the negotiation meeting between ASUU and the
Federal Government would continue tomorrow, stressing that what the union was
doing was to rescue the education sector from imminent collapse and to ensure
that the children of the poor get access to quality and affordable education.
The ASUU boss also said that last Friday’s meeting between the two parties did
not yield much results.
He
said: “Well, we have confirmed that
they have withdrawn that threat (no work no pay). So it appears the threat is
not there for now. But even if the threat is there, we are prepared for that
because for our members, no sacrifice is too much to salvage Nigeria’s
education.
“Shortly
before our action while the NLC (Nigeria Labour Congress) hullabaloo was going
on with federal government, they went to the Federal Executive Council that
they were activating that rule.”
Meanwhile,
human rights lawyer, Mr. Femi Falana, SAN said yesterday: ”Although the Federal
Government referred to “extant rules” to justify the ‘no work, no pay’ policy
the directive is anchored on section 43 (1) of the Trade Disputes Act which
provides that “any worker who takes part in a strike shall not be entitled to
any wages or other remuneration for the period of the strike…”.
In
resorting to the desperate measure the Federal Government was not properly
advised. Otherwise, it would have realized that even under the defunct military
junta the application of ‘no work no pay’ rule, threat to eject lectures living
in official quarters, promulgation of a decree which made strike in schools a
treasonable offence and the proscription of ASUU did not collapse any of the
strikes called by ASUU. ”
It
is submitted that the latest strike embarked upon by ASUU has complied with the
provisions of section 31 (6) of the Trade Disputes (Amendment) Act, 2005. Since
the law does not punish acts which are lawful in any democratic society section 43(1) of the Trade Disputes Act cannot
be invoked to justify the seizure of the salaries and allowances of members of
the ASUU who have decided to participate in an industrial action that is legal
in every material particular. Under the current labour law regime only those
who take part in illegal strikes are liable to be prosecuted and forfeit their
salaries and allowances.
Source: Vanguardngr
Comments
Post a Comment
Disclaimer: All comments on this blog are the thought and opinion of blog readers, We will not in anyway be liable for them. Thank you.